This school of thought in geographical study posits that while the natural environment sets certain constraints or limitations, culture is the primary force shaping human actions. It emphasizes that people are active agents with the capacity to choose among a range of possibilities, innovating and adapting to their surroundings rather than being rigidly determined by them. An example is agricultural practices in arid regions. Despite limited rainfall, societies might develop irrigation systems, cultivate drought-resistant crops, and implement water conservation techniques, thereby expanding agricultural potential beyond what purely environmental determinism would suggest.
The value of this perspective lies in its acknowledgment of human agency and the role of culture in transforming landscapes. It provides a nuanced understanding of the interaction between humans and their environment, moving beyond the simplistic notion that the environment dictates human behavior. Historically, it arose as a critique of environmental determinism, offering a more empowering and realistic portrayal of human-environment relationships. This shift promoted a more holistic approach to geographical studies, incorporating cultural, social, and economic factors into analyses.