The collection of writings expressing opposition to the proposed United States Constitution during the ratification debate of 1787-1788 are known by a specific designation. These essays, penned under various pseudonyms, articulated concerns about centralized power and advocated for the preservation of states’ rights. A primary example of such concern centered on the absence of a bill of rights in the initial Constitution draft.
These dissenting arguments are significant because they shaped the early development of American political thought and influenced the inclusion of the Bill of Rights. They provide valuable insight into the fears and reservations held by a segment of the population regarding a strong national government. Their historical context is rooted in anxieties about replicating the perceived tyranny of the British monarchy.