A meta-ethical theory posits that moral obligations are derived from the decrees of a divine being. In essence, an act is considered morally right because a deity commands it, and morally wrong because a deity forbids it. For instance, if a divine being commands honesty, then honesty becomes a moral imperative; conversely, if a divine being prohibits theft, then theft becomes morally wrong.
This framework offers a seemingly objective foundation for morality, anchoring ethical principles in the authority of a transcendent being. Proponents suggest that it provides a clear and unambiguous source of moral guidance, potentially fostering social order and stability. Throughout history, various religious traditions have incorporated aspects of this framework, influencing legal systems, social norms, and individual conduct. However, it also raises complex questions regarding interpretation of divine commands, potential conflicts between different religious doctrines, and the problem of moral arbitrariness if divine commands lack a rational basis.
