A trial conducted without a jury, where the judge serves as both the finder of fact and the arbiter of the law, is a process wherein the court alone decides the outcome of the case. In this type of proceeding, the judge hears evidence, assesses the credibility of witnesses, and renders a verdict. For example, in a civil dispute involving a contract disagreement, if both parties waive their right to a jury, the judge will determine whether a breach occurred and the appropriate remedy.
This method of adjudication offers several advantages, including potentially reduced costs and faster resolution times, as it eliminates the complexities of jury selection and deliberation. Historically, such proceedings have been prevalent in cases involving complex legal issues or where it is believed a judge’s expertise will lead to a more just outcome. This approach ensures that the decision is based solely on legal principles and the evidence presented.
