A suburb, in the context of Advanced Placement Human Geography, refers to a residential area located on the periphery of a city. These areas are generally characterized by lower population density compared to the urban core, and often feature single-family homes, lawns, and a greater reliance on automobiles for transportation. An example is Levittown, New York, a post-World War II development that epitomized suburban growth in the United States.
Understanding the nature and evolution of these areas is crucial to studying urban spatial patterns and the factors that shape them. Their development has significant implications for transportation infrastructure, environmental sustainability, social stratification, and economic activity within a metropolitan area. Historically, suburbanization has been driven by factors such as the availability of affordable housing, increased automobile ownership, and the desire for a perceived better quality of life, often linked to access to better schools and lower crime rates.
The study of these residential areas connects to broader themes within the field, including urban models (such as the concentric zone model and sector model), the processes of gentrification and urban sprawl, and the challenges of managing growth and promoting sustainable urban development. Analyzing the spatial organization and demographic characteristics of these areas provides insights into the complex interplay between social, economic, and environmental forces shaping human settlements.
1. Residential periphery
The “residential periphery” constitutes a fundamental component in defining areas surrounding cities within the scope of AP Human Geography. Its location, at the edge of urban centers, inherently shapes the characteristics of the areas under study. The growth of these residential zones is intrinsically tied to urban sprawl, facilitated by factors like improved transportation infrastructure and the desire for larger, more affordable housing options away from the density and higher costs associated with central city locations. As these areas develop on the residential periphery, they often lead to changes in land use, increased reliance on automobiles, and the emergence of distinct socioeconomic patterns. For instance, the expansion of suburbs around Atlanta, Georgia, exemplifies the transformation of previously rural land into residential developments, accompanied by an increase in traffic congestion and infrastructure demands. This outward expansion can alter demographics, housing options and land use.
The significance of the “residential periphery” lies in its ability to illustrate the impacts of urbanization on both the environment and social structures. As urban populations seek residence in these outlying zones, it gives rise to concerns of land consumption, habitat fragmentation, and increased carbon emissions due to longer commute distances. Furthermore, the spatial separation between residential areas and employment centers, often inherent in suburban landscapes, can lead to inequalities in access to jobs, services, and opportunities, particularly for those without reliable transportation. The evolution of suburban communities surrounding major cities highlights these issues, creating a dependence on cars and impacting air quality, altering population distribution.
In summary, the “residential periphery” is a critical element in grasping the complexities of urban and suburban development within the context of AP Human Geography. Its study provides valuable insights into the causes and consequences of urban sprawl, the challenges of balancing economic growth with environmental sustainability, and the impact of spatial patterns on social equity. Understanding the dynamics of these areas is crucial for developing effective strategies for managing urban growth, promoting sustainable land use, and addressing the social and economic disparities that often arise in suburban landscapes. These communities are important for the study of urban and suburban development and expansion of cities.
2. Lower Density
Areas surrounding cities, within the framework of AP Human Geography, are commonly characterized by a diminished population concentration compared to the urban core. This characteristic is a key factor in their identification and differentiation from the more densely populated city center. This diminished concentration stems from several factors, including larger lot sizes for single-family homes, the prevalence of green spaces, and zoning regulations that restrict high-rise construction. For example, the prevalence of single-family homes with yards in many suburbs of Detroit contributes significantly to their lower population density compared to the city itself. The concept influences land use patterns, impacting transportation infrastructure and resource consumption.
The effect of this demographic pattern extends beyond mere residential spacing. It fundamentally shapes transportation patterns, infrastructure requirements, and the economic landscape of the region. With residents more geographically dispersed, reliance on personal vehicles increases, leading to increased traffic congestion and a greater demand for road infrastructure. Concurrently, public transportation systems face challenges in efficiently serving lower-density areas, potentially exacerbating dependence on private automobiles. Moreover, the prevalence of single-family homes can contribute to higher per capita consumption of resources, such as water and energy, compared to more compact urban environments. An example is the development of Sun Belt cities like Phoenix, Arizona, where lower density suburbs contribute to significant water consumption challenges in an arid environment.
In summary, the relatively low population concentration in areas surrounding cities is a crucial element in defining and understanding these areas within the context of AP Human Geography. It has significant implications for transportation, resource management, and environmental sustainability. By recognizing and analyzing this aspect, a more complete understanding of urban-suburban dynamics and the challenges associated with managing growth and development in metropolitan areas is achieved. Recognizing the impact that Lower Density has on water consumption and transportation contributes to understanding AP Human Geography concept of suburban areas
3. Automobile Dependence
Automobile dependence is a critical characteristic intertwined with the definition of areas surrounding cities in AP Human Geography. It significantly shapes the spatial organization, infrastructure development, and lifestyle patterns prevalent in these residential zones. The reliance on personal vehicles has profound implications for land use, environmental sustainability, and social equity within metropolitan areas.
-
Spatial Organization and Land Use
Increased reliance on vehicles dictates dispersed land use patterns. Single-family homes on large lots, separated commercial districts, and limited mixed-use developments necessitate driving for most daily activities. This spatial arrangement contrasts sharply with the more compact, pedestrian-friendly designs of traditional urban centers, impacting travel distances and accessibility.
-
Infrastructure Development
The need for vehicles directly influences infrastructure investments. Road networks are expanded to accommodate higher traffic volumes, often at the expense of public transportation alternatives. Parking facilities become ubiquitous, further reinforcing the car-centric nature. Investment decisions prioritize roadways instead of other forms of infrastructure like public transit.
-
Environmental Impact
High levels of vehicle usage contribute significantly to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, exacerbating environmental problems. Increased paving for roads and parking lots leads to stormwater runoff and habitat fragmentation. The ecological footprint per capita tends to be larger in areas characterized by significant reliance on vehicles compared to urban centers.
-
Socioeconomic Considerations
Reliance on vehicles can create barriers for low-income individuals, the elderly, and those with disabilities who may not be able to afford or operate a personal vehicle. Reduced access to employment, services, and social opportunities can exacerbate social inequalities. Transportation costs become a significant burden for households with limited financial resources. Those without access to a vehicle can become socially isolated.
In conclusion, automobile dependence is intrinsically linked to the definition and understanding of areas surrounding cities in AP Human Geography. The dependence on vehicles shapes patterns of urban development, impacts environmental sustainability, and influences socioeconomic opportunities. An examination of areas surrounding cities must take into account the role of transportation choices and their implications for the spatial organization and daily lives of residents.
4. Single-family homes
The prevalence of single-family homes is a defining characteristic intimately linked to the nature of areas surrounding cities within the context of AP Human Geography. This housing type shapes land use patterns, influences social demographics, and contributes to the overall spatial organization of areas outside the urban core.
-
Land Use and Spatial Organization
Single-family homes necessitate larger lot sizes compared to multi-family dwellings, contributing to lower population densities. This spatial arrangement encourages urban sprawl and leads to a reliance on automobiles for transportation, as residents are often further from employment centers, commercial districts, and public services. The prevalence of these homes necessitates more space in a given area, impacting the arrangement of transportation, stores and schools.
-
Socioeconomic Implications
The affordability and availability of single-family homes are often correlated with socioeconomic status. These homes are frequently associated with a higher standard of living, attracting middle-class and upper-middle-class residents. This can lead to socioeconomic segregation within metropolitan areas, as lower-income individuals may be priced out of areas dominated by single-family housing. Access to resources are impacted by the locations of the housing.
-
Environmental Impact
The construction and maintenance of single-family homes can have a significant environmental footprint. Larger homes typically consume more energy for heating and cooling, and larger lots require more water for landscaping. Furthermore, the increased automobile dependence associated with areas dominated by single-family homes contributes to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Land is cleared for housing which impacts natural habitats.
-
Infrastructure Demands
Areas predominated by single-family homes necessitate extensive infrastructure networks to provide essential services. Roads, water lines, sewer systems, and electrical grids must be extended to serve dispersed populations, increasing the cost and complexity of infrastructure development. This presents long-term financial challenges for local governments. These infrastructure concerns create strains for suburban communities.
In conclusion, the predominance of single-family homes is a crucial element in understanding the dynamics of areas surrounding cities within AP Human Geography. Its influence extends across spatial organization, socioeconomic structures, environmental sustainability, and infrastructure requirements. Examining the role of housing preferences and their broader implications is essential for comprehending the complexities of urban and suburban development.
5. Urban fringe
The urban fringe serves as the physical and functional transition zone where urban land uses interface with rural activities. It represents a critical component within the framework of suburban areas, as defined in AP Human Geography. This zone is characterized by a mix of residential, commercial, and agricultural activities, often exhibiting a fragmented landscape shaped by the ongoing process of urban sprawl. The expansion of areas surrounding cities typically originates at the urban fringe, driven by factors such as lower land costs and the desire for larger residential properties. An example is the rapid development observed along the edges of metropolitan areas like Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, where subdivisions and shopping centers are replacing agricultural land at an accelerated pace. Consequently, understanding the characteristics and dynamics of the urban fringe is essential for comprehending the evolution and spatial patterns of areas surrounding cities.
The processes occurring within the urban fringe have significant implications for environmental sustainability and resource management. Conversion of agricultural land to residential or commercial uses can lead to habitat loss, increased stormwater runoff, and reduced biodiversity. The increased reliance on automobiles for transportation in these peripheral areas contributes to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, the fragmentation of land ownership and the lack of coordinated planning can result in inefficient land use patterns and increased infrastructure costs. For instance, the development of low-density housing in the urban fringe often requires extensive road networks and utility infrastructure, straining public resources. The Atlanta metropolitan area, with its sprawling pattern of development, demonstrates the challenges of managing growth and providing services in a fragmented urban fringe.
In conclusion, the urban fringe is an integral element in the study of areas surrounding cities within AP Human Geography. Its role as a zone of transition and expansion highlights the complex interplay between urban and rural land uses and the environmental and social consequences of urban sprawl. Recognizing the dynamics of the urban fringe is crucial for developing strategies to promote sustainable land use planning, protect natural resources, and mitigate the negative impacts of urbanization in metropolitan areas. The continuous growth of the urban fringe presents ongoing challenges that necessitate careful analysis and innovative solutions for the effective management of urban expansion.
6. Commuting patterns
Commuting patterns are intrinsically linked to the definition of areas surrounding cities within the scope of AP Human Geography. Understanding these patterns is crucial for analyzing the spatial organization, economic activity, and social dynamics that characterize suburban landscapes. The movement of people between residential areas and employment centers significantly shapes the demographic composition, infrastructure development, and environmental impact associated with these zones.
-
Reverse Commuting
Reverse commuting, where individuals residing in urban centers travel to employment opportunities located in suburban areas, represents an evolving facet of commuting patterns. This phenomenon is driven by factors such as the decentralization of industries, the growth of office parks and business campuses in suburban locales, and the availability of affordable housing in urban cores. Reverse commuting patterns influence transportation infrastructure, as roadways and public transit systems must accommodate the flow of traffic in both directions during peak hours. Furthermore, it impacts the economic vitality of suburban areas, contributing to increased tax revenues and job creation. This often-overlooked aspect alters traditional understandings of commuting flows and their effects on areas surrounding cities.
-
Peak Hour Congestion
Areas surrounding cities often experience significant peak hour congestion due to the concentration of commuting trips during morning and evening rush hours. This congestion results in increased travel times, higher fuel consumption, and elevated levels of air pollution. The design and capacity of transportation infrastructure are directly influenced by these commuting patterns, necessitating investments in highway expansions, traffic management systems, and public transit alternatives. The economic costs associated with peak hour congestion, including lost productivity and increased healthcare expenses, underscore the importance of understanding and addressing these transportation challenges within suburban areas. Addressing traffic concerns is important for long-term success of cities.
-
Mode of Transportation
The predominant mode of transportation utilized by commuters significantly shapes the environmental impact and infrastructure needs of areas surrounding cities. Reliance on private automobiles contributes to higher greenhouse gas emissions and increased dependence on fossil fuels. Conversely, the adoption of alternative modes of transportation, such as public transit, cycling, and carpooling, can help to reduce these environmental impacts and alleviate traffic congestion. The availability and accessibility of various transportation options are key factors influencing commuting behavior, highlighting the importance of transportation planning and investment decisions in shaping more sustainable and equitable patterns.
-
Socioeconomic Disparities
Commuting patterns can exacerbate socioeconomic disparities within metropolitan areas. Low-income individuals and those residing in marginalized neighborhoods often face longer commute times and limited access to affordable transportation options, restricting their access to employment opportunities and essential services. These disparities can perpetuate cycles of poverty and inequality, highlighting the need for transportation policies and investments that prioritize equitable access and mobility for all residents. Understanding how different socio-economic backgrounds access resources reveals the relationship between AP Human Geography and patterns of transportation.
In conclusion, commuting patterns are a fundamental element in defining and understanding areas surrounding cities within the context of AP Human Geography. The dynamics of commuting, including reverse commuting, peak hour congestion, mode of transportation, and socioeconomic disparities, significantly influence the spatial organization, environmental sustainability, and social equity of suburban landscapes. Analyzing commuting patterns provides valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities associated with managing growth and promoting sustainable development in metropolitan areas.
7. Socioeconomic factors
Socioeconomic factors are crucial determinants influencing the evolution, spatial organization, and character of suburban areas as studied in AP Human Geography. The dynamics of income, education, occupation, and social status directly shape the residential choices, lifestyle patterns, and community structures observed in these zones, providing a critical lens through which to understand the suburban landscape.
-
Income Segregation
Income levels often dictate the types of housing available and the neighborhoods where individuals can afford to reside. Higher-income households typically gravitate towards exclusive areas characterized by larger homes, superior amenities, and perceived better schools, leading to the formation of affluent enclaves. Conversely, lower-income households may be relegated to less desirable areas with limited housing options and fewer resources. This segregation based on income contributes to distinct suburban typologies and reinforces social inequalities. For example, wealthy suburbs like Beverly Hills, California, stand in stark contrast to more modest suburban communities in the same metropolitan area.
-
Educational Attainment
Levels of educational attainment correlate significantly with suburban residential patterns. Families with higher educational levels often seek areas with highly-rated public schools or proximity to private educational institutions. This demand drives up housing prices and shapes the demographic composition of school districts, creating disparities in educational opportunities across different suburban areas. The presence of top-ranked schools in suburbs like Scarsdale, New York, attracts highly educated families willing to pay a premium for housing.
-
Occupational Structure
The occupational profile of a suburban population influences its economic base and lifestyle preferences. Areas dominated by professional and managerial occupations tend to exhibit higher levels of consumer spending, demand for specialized services, and support for cultural amenities. Conversely, suburbs with a higher proportion of blue-collar workers may prioritize affordability and proximity to industrial or manufacturing employment centers. The concentration of tech industry workers in suburbs surrounding Silicon Valley shapes the real estate market and local economy.
-
Social Status and Lifestyle
Social status and lifestyle preferences play a role in shaping suburban communities. Areas with a strong sense of community, access to recreational amenities, and opportunities for social interaction tend to attract families and individuals seeking a particular quality of life. These preferences can lead to the formation of niche areas characterized by specific architectural styles, cultural values, and recreational pursuits. For example, suburbs with a strong emphasis on outdoor recreation may attract residents who value access to parks, trails, and outdoor activities.
In conclusion, socioeconomic factors are indispensable for a comprehensive understanding of areas surrounding cities within AP Human Geography. These elements significantly influence residential segregation, educational opportunities, economic activity, and lifestyle patterns, shaping the character and dynamics of suburban landscapes. An analysis of these factors is essential for interpreting the spatial organization and social fabric of the suburban environment and for addressing the challenges associated with inequality and sustainable development in metropolitan areas.
8. Land use zoning
Land use zoning is a critical mechanism shaping the spatial form and functional organization of suburban areas, forming a foundational element in the definition within AP Human Geography. These regulations dictate the permitted activities and building types on specific parcels of land, thereby influencing the density, character, and overall development patterns of areas surrounding cities. Zoning practices, often implemented at the municipal level, determine whether a given area will primarily host residential, commercial, industrial, or mixed-use developments. This segregation of land uses is a defining characteristic differentiating many from traditional urban centers, which tend to exhibit greater mixed-use integration. For example, the prevalence of single-family residential zones in many areas around cities contributes significantly to their lower population density and dependence on automobiles.
The implementation of land use zoning ordinances has both intended and unintended consequences. While designed to promote orderly development, protect property values, and ensure public health and safety, zoning can also contribute to social segregation, limit housing affordability, and exacerbate environmental problems. Minimum lot size requirements, a common zoning tool, can effectively exclude lower-income households from areas zoned for single-family residences. Similarly, restrictions on multi-family housing development can limit the supply of affordable rental options, further contributing to housing shortages. The exclusionary zoning practices prevalent in many areas around cities have been cited as a factor contributing to racial and socioeconomic disparities. These regulations dictate where different types of building can be built. Houston, Texas, stands out as an exception, lacking traditional zoning ordinances, resulting in a more mixed land use pattern compared to other major metropolitan areas.
In conclusion, land use zoning is an indispensable concept for understanding areas surrounding cities in AP Human Geography. Its influence extends beyond mere regulatory compliance, shaping the spatial landscape, social composition, and environmental sustainability of these residential zones. Understanding the principles and impacts of land use zoning is essential for evaluating the challenges and opportunities associated with managing growth and promoting equitable and sustainable development in suburban regions. Zoning directly impacts transportation, housing and population distributions.
9. Decentralization
Decentralization, the dispersal of activities and populations away from a central urban core, is a pivotal process in shaping the definition and characteristics of areas surrounding cities within the framework of AP Human Geography. It serves as both a cause and consequence of suburbanization, profoundly influencing land use patterns, transportation systems, and socioeconomic dynamics. The phenomenon involves the relocation of residential areas, businesses, and industries from the central city to its periphery, driven by factors such as lower land costs, reduced congestion, and the perception of a higher quality of life. This outward movement fundamentally transforms the spatial organization of metropolitan areas. For instance, the rise of edge cities, like Tysons Corner, Virginia, exemplifies the decentralization of economic activity, creating self-sufficient nodes of employment and commerce outside the traditional downtown area. These emerging centers are important to the economy, allowing businesses and people to work outside of the central hub.
Decentralization’s significance within the context of suburban areas lies in its role in creating and reinforcing distinct spatial and social patterns. As activities shift outwards, reliance on automobiles increases, leading to the development of extensive road networks and contributing to urban sprawl. This dispersal also affects the tax base of central cities, potentially leading to fiscal challenges and disparities in public services. Furthermore, decentralization often results in socioeconomic segregation, as affluent populations migrate to the periphery, while lower-income residents remain concentrated in the inner city. The historical example of Detroit, Michigan, illustrates the detrimental effects of population and job loss on the central city following extensive decentralization to its areas surrounding cities. As businesses and manufacturing closed in the city, the economy declined, resulting in less funding for public services.
In conclusion, decentralization is an indispensable component in defining and understanding areas surrounding cities within AP Human Geography. Its influence extends across spatial, economic, and social dimensions, shaping the characteristics and challenges associated with urban expansion. By analyzing the forces driving decentralization and its consequences, a more comprehensive understanding of suburbanization and its impact on metropolitan areas can be achieved. This includes acknowledging the challenges of managing growth, promoting equitable development, and fostering sustainable transportation alternatives in increasingly decentralized urban landscapes.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the precise meaning and context of the areas outside the city center within the Advanced Placement Human Geography curriculum. Clarifying these points is essential for a robust understanding of urban spatial patterns and their associated phenomena.
Question 1: Does the AP Human Geography definition of a residential periphery encompass all areas outside the central city?
The definition generally refers to residential areas on the periphery but may also include commercial and industrial zones closely integrated with the residential landscape. The key differentiator is the relatively lower population density and dependence on the central city for employment or services.
Question 2: How does the AP Human Geography curriculum differentiate a residential periphery from a rural area?
Areas on the periphery, while less dense than urban cores, exhibit a greater degree of urbanization than rural areas. They typically have more developed infrastructure, closer connections to the city’s economic and social systems, and a greater prevalence of residential subdivisions and commercial centers.
Question 3: Is automobile dependence an absolute requirement for a location to be classified as an area surrounding cities according to AP Human Geography standards?
While high reliance on personal vehicles is a common characteristic, it is not an absolute requirement. Areas with well-developed public transportation systems may still qualify as residential peripheries, especially if they exhibit other suburban characteristics like lower density and single-family housing.
Question 4: Does the definition of the areas on the outskirts of a city vary significantly across different regions or countries?
The core principles remain consistent, but specific characteristics can vary. For example, residential areas in European countries may exhibit higher densities and greater reliance on public transit compared to their North American counterparts. Contextual awareness is crucial when applying the definition to diverse geographical settings.
Question 5: Are areas on the periphery always homogenous in terms of socioeconomic characteristics?
No. Residential peripheries can exhibit significant socioeconomic diversity. Some may be characterized by affluence and exclusivity, while others may be more diverse or even predominantly low-income. Socioeconomic stratification is a critical aspect of suburban studies within AP Human Geography.
Question 6: How does the study of suburban areas connect to broader themes within AP Human Geography?
The study of suburban areas connects to various themes, including urban models, migration patterns, economic development, environmental sustainability, and social inequality. It provides a valuable lens through which to examine the complex interplay of forces shaping human settlements.
Understanding the nuances of the areas surrounding cities, as defined within AP Human Geography, provides a foundation for analyzing complex urban and regional dynamics. Careful consideration of density, transportation patterns, housing types, and socioeconomic factors is essential for a comprehensive understanding.
Next, the discussion transitions to exploring the historical context and evolution of the concept of “suburb definition ap human geography.”
Examining Suburb Definition in AP Human Geography
The following tips provide guidance for understanding and applying the concept of areas surrounding cities within the context of Advanced Placement Human Geography. Employing these suggestions can enhance comprehension of urban spatial organization and associated processes.
Tip 1: Emphasize the Multifaceted Nature of the Term
The areas surrounding cities involve more than just residential areas. Consider the interplay of residential, commercial, and industrial land uses, as well as their interconnectedness. A comprehensive understanding requires evaluating these different facets rather than focusing solely on housing.
Tip 2: Connect Characteristics to Driving Forces
Link suburban characteristics, such as low density and automobile dependence, to their underlying causes. Factors like zoning regulations, transportation infrastructure investments, and consumer preferences shape areas surrounding cities. Analyzing these drivers provides deeper insight into development patterns.
Tip 3: Compare and Contrast Areas Surrounding Cities Typologies
Recognize that not all residential periphery are identical. Differentiate between affluent enclaves, working-class areas, and edge cities. Analyzing the socioeconomic variations within residential periphery reveals the complexities of urban spatial structure.
Tip 4: Evaluate the Environmental Consequences
Assess the environmental impacts associated with suburban development. Focus on issues such as urban sprawl, habitat fragmentation, increased vehicle emissions, and water consumption. A critical approach is essential for understanding the sustainability challenges posed by areas surrounding cities.
Tip 5: Analyze Socioeconomic Implications
Explore the socioeconomic implications of areas surrounding cities, including residential segregation, unequal access to resources, and transportation disparities. Consider how suburban development patterns may exacerbate existing social inequalities. Access to services are not consistent across suburban areas.
Tip 6: Utilize Urban Models to Explain Residential Periphery Development
Employ urban models, such as the concentric zone model and sector model, to illustrate patterns of areas surrounding cities growth and spatial organization. Understanding these models provides a framework for analyzing the distribution of activities and populations within metropolitan areas. This concept is important for testing in the AP Human Geography test.
Tip 7: Study Transportation and Commuting Patterns
Examine how commuting patterns affect transportation decisions and infrastructure demands of areas surrounding cities. Analyze how reverse commuting, peak hour congestion, and mode of transportation shapes development patterns. Assess the long-term needs of areas that rely on cars as primary transportation.
A thorough understanding of the term within AP Human Geography requires analyzing its multifaceted nature, connecting characteristics to driving forces, differentiating typologies, evaluating environmental consequences, and exploring socioeconomic implications.
The next section explores how the definition relates to real-world case studies and examples.
Suburb Definition AP Human Geography
The preceding analysis has underscored the multifaceted nature of the areas outside the city center within the AP Human Geography framework. It is not simply a residential zone, but a complex landscape shaped by intertwined factors including lower density, automobile dependence, and specific socioeconomic conditions. Land use zoning and decentralization processes further mold the suburban form and function, impacting everything from commuting patterns to environmental sustainability.
Understanding the intricacies of this residential area is essential for informed engagement with contemporary urban issues. Continued scrutiny of evolving development patterns, infrastructure challenges, and social dynamics within these communities is crucial for fostering equitable and sustainable metropolitan regions. The term “suburb definition AP Human Geography” provides the basis for analyzing the challenges and opportunities associated with growth and development in metropolitan areas.
