The English Standard Version (ESV) is a translation of the Bible aiming for accuracy and readability. Its goal is to be faithful to the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts while employing contemporary English. The question of its quality arises frequently among Bible readers, scholars, and theologians, influencing its adoption and use in various contexts.
The relevance of evaluating a Bible translation centers on its ability to convey the original meaning accurately and accessibly. A successful translation serves as a reliable conduit to understanding scripture, impacting personal devotion, theological study, and public worship. Historical context is essential as translation philosophies and linguistic understanding evolve over time, shaping different versions with unique strengths and weaknesses.
Further discussion will explore specific features of the ESV, comparing it to other translations and examining critical perspectives on its strengths and limitations, providing a more nuanced understanding of its overall effectiveness.
1. Accuracy
Accuracy, in the context of Bible translation, signifies the degree to which a translated text reflects the meaning of the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. In evaluating the English Standard Version (ESV), its accuracy stands as a primary criterion in determining its value as a translation.
-
Textual Basis
The accuracy of any translation depends fundamentally on the underlying textual basis used by the translators. The ESV primarily relies on the Masoretic Text for the Old Testament and the critical texts of Nestle-Aland and the United Bible Societies for the New Testament. Utilizing well-regarded textual sources enhances the potential accuracy of the resulting translation, though interpretive choices remain.
-
Formal Equivalence
The ESV employs a primarily “essentially literal” or formal equivalence translation philosophy. This approach seeks to render the original language’s words and grammatical structures as closely as possible in English. While aiming for greater accuracy in mirroring the original, strict adherence to formal equivalence can sometimes result in awkward or less natural English phrasing, potentially obscuring the intended meaning for some readers.
-
Lexical Consistency
Lexical consistency refers to the uniform translation of key terms throughout the text. The ESV strives for this consistency, aiming to use the same English word to translate a particular Greek or Hebrew word whenever possible. This enhances accuracy by reducing ambiguity and allowing readers to trace theological and thematic connections across different passages. However, strict adherence to lexical consistency can occasionally lead to unnatural English or fail to capture nuances of meaning in different contexts.
-
Interpretive Choices
Despite its commitment to formal equivalence, the translation process inevitably involves interpretive choices. Translators must decide how to render ambiguous passages, resolve textual variants, and account for idiomatic expressions. These choices can subtly influence the meaning conveyed in the English text. Evaluating the ESV’s accuracy requires considering the extent to which these interpretive decisions are justifiable based on sound scholarship and minimize potential biases.
The accuracy of the ESV is a multifaceted issue influenced by its textual basis, translation philosophy, commitment to lexical consistency, and the inevitable interpretive choices made during the translation process. While aiming for a high degree of accuracy through formal equivalence, it is crucial to recognize the potential trade-offs between literal rendering and naturalness of expression when evaluating the overall effectiveness of the ESV as a reliable and accessible translation.
2. Readability
Readability, in the context of evaluating a Bible translation, assesses the ease with which the text can be understood by its intended audience. Determining the readability of the English Standard Version (ESV) is essential to judging its overall effectiveness as a tool for conveying scripture.
-
Sentence Structure and Flow
The ESV generally employs a contemporary English style with moderately complex sentence structures. While not overly simplified, it aims to avoid archaic phrasing. However, the commitment to a more formal equivalence sometimes results in sentences that may require careful attention, particularly for readers less familiar with theological language or intricate grammatical constructions. This characteristic impacts the pace at which the text can be absorbed and understood.
-
Vocabulary Choices
The ESV’s vocabulary reflects a balance between traditional biblical terminology and more accessible modern English. It utilizes some theological vocabulary that might be unfamiliar to the average reader without prior religious education. The presence of such terms can pose a barrier to comprehension, requiring consultation of dictionaries or commentaries for clarification. Careful consideration of word choices and their potential impact on reader understanding is thus a significant aspect of evaluating its readability.
-
Clarity of Meaning
Ultimately, readability hinges on the clarity of meaning conveyed by the text. Even if the sentence structure and vocabulary are relatively straightforward, ambiguities or inconsistencies in translation can hinder comprehension. In some instances, the ESV’s adherence to formal equivalence might lead to renderings that, while accurate to the original language, lack clarity in contemporary English. Therefore, careful consideration of how clearly the ESV conveys the original meaning, even at the expense of some literalness, is crucial.
-
Target Audience Considerations
The intended target audience influences the perception of readability. The ESV seems geared towards a relatively educated audience familiar with biblical language and concepts. While beneficial for academic study and theological reflection, its readability might be limited for those seeking a more introductory or simplified version. The extent to which the ESV successfully reaches its intended audience, while maintaining accuracy, impacts its overall value.
The readability of the ESV is a nuanced consideration. While its contemporary language and moderately complex sentence structure aim to balance accuracy and accessibility, potential challenges related to vocabulary choices, clarity of meaning, and target audience considerations require careful evaluation. Ultimately, the perceived ease of understanding the ESV is a significant factor influencing its effectiveness as a widely used Bible translation.
3. Original Text
The assessment of a translation, such as the English Standard Version (ESV), is inextricably linked to the nature and quality of the original texts upon which it is based. The selection and interpretation of the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek manuscripts profoundly influence the accuracy, reliability, and ultimately, the perceived value of the translation itself.
-
Old Testament Textual Basis
The ESV Old Testament primarily relies on the Masoretic Text, a standardized Hebrew text established between the 7th and 10th centuries CE. While widely respected, it is not without variations and textual uncertainties. The ESV’s choices regarding variant readings within the Masoretic Text, and its occasional departures in favor of alternative readings from sources like the Dead Sea Scrolls or the Septuagint (Greek translation of the Old Testament), impact its interpretation of specific passages. For instance, differences in vowel pointing within the Masoretic Text can dramatically alter the meaning of a word, requiring translators to make informed decisions based on scholarly consensus and contextual understanding. These decisions directly affect how accurately the ESV conveys the Old Testament’s message.
-
New Testament Textual Basis
The ESV New Testament is primarily based on the critical texts produced by Nestle-Aland and the United Bible Societies. These critical texts are constructed through a rigorous process of collating and evaluating thousands of Greek manuscripts, identifying the most likely original readings. However, disagreements persist among textual scholars regarding the authenticity of certain passages and the optimal reconstruction of the original text. The ESV’s decisions regarding textual variants, such as the inclusion or exclusion of the longer ending of Mark (16:9-20) or the passage about the woman caught in adultery (John 7:53-8:11), directly influence the content and interpretation presented to the reader. The transparency with which the ESV addresses these textual variations and explains its rationale contributes to its credibility as a scholarly translation.
-
Textual Criticism and Translation Philosophy
The translation philosophy adopted by the ESV, primarily formal equivalence, interacts with the underlying textual basis. While aiming for a literal rendering of the original text, translators must inevitably make interpretive choices when dealing with textual ambiguities or uncertainties. For example, if the original Greek text contains a grammatical construction that is difficult to render directly into English, the translator must decide how to best convey the intended meaning while remaining faithful to the original. These decisions are informed by textual criticism, which provides the tools for evaluating the evidence and determining the most likely original reading. The balance between literalness and clarity is therefore constantly negotiated in light of the complexities of the original text.
-
Impact on Theological Interpretation
The choice of original text and the manner in which it is translated directly impact theological interpretation. Differences in textual readings can lead to divergent understandings of key doctrines or ethical principles. For example, the interpretation of specific verses related to salvation, the nature of Christ, or the role of the Holy Spirit can be significantly affected by textual variations and the translator’s choices in rendering those variations. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the original text and the interpretive decisions made by the ESV translators is essential for discerning the theological implications of the translation.
In conclusion, the perceived quality of the ESV is intimately tied to the original texts it seeks to represent. Its reliance on established textual traditions, coupled with its commitment to a primarily formal equivalence translation philosophy, shapes its accuracy and influences theological interpretation. Understanding the complexities inherent in the selection and interpretation of the original text is crucial for evaluating the ESV and its place among other English Bible translations.
4. Translation Philosophy
The assessment of a translation’s quality, such as the English Standard Version (ESV), hinges significantly on its underlying translation philosophy. This philosophy dictates the approach taken by translators in transferring meaning from the original languages (Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek) to the target language (English). The ESV primarily adheres to a translation philosophy known as “essentially literal” or formal equivalence. This method prioritizes maintaining the grammatical structures and word order of the source text as closely as possible. The effectiveness of this philosophy directly impacts whether the ESV is perceived as a “good translation.” A strict adherence to formal equivalence may produce a translation that is highly accurate in its representation of the original text’s form but potentially sacrifices clarity and naturalness in the target language. For example, complex Hebrew sentence structures, when directly translated into English, can result in convoluted phrasing that obscures the intended meaning for modern readers.
Conversely, a translation philosophy known as dynamic equivalence (or functional equivalence) prioritizes conveying the intended meaning of the original text in a way that is natural and understandable to the target audience, even if it necessitates deviating from the original grammatical structure. While this approach can enhance readability, it also introduces a greater degree of interpretive subjectivity, potentially leading to a translation that reflects the translator’s theological or cultural biases. The ESV’s choice of formal equivalence aims to minimize this subjective element, but it also necessitates careful consideration of instances where a more dynamic approach might be warranted to prevent misinterpretations. The practical significance of understanding this lies in recognizing that no translation philosophy is without its trade-offs. The ESV’s commitment to formal equivalence shapes its strengths and weaknesses, influencing its suitability for various purposes, such as academic study, devotional reading, or public worship.
In conclusion, the translation philosophy underlying the ESV is a crucial determinant in evaluating its overall quality. Its formal equivalence approach contributes to its reputation for accuracy and fidelity to the original text, but it also presents challenges in terms of readability and naturalness of expression. Understanding the implications of this translation philosophy is essential for readers to make informed judgments about the ESV’s strengths, limitations, and suitability for their specific needs. The ongoing debate surrounding the ESV’s merits often centers on the effectiveness and appropriateness of its chosen translation philosophy in conveying the timeless message of the scriptures to a contemporary audience.
5. Theological Bias
The presence of theological bias within a Bible translation directly impacts its perceived quality and reliability. Assessing the degree to which the English Standard Version (ESV) reflects a particular theological perspective is crucial in determining its overall value and appropriateness for different uses. While aiming for accuracy and fidelity to the original texts, all translations are, to some extent, influenced by the translators’ pre-existing theological commitments. This influence can manifest subtly in word choices, interpretations of ambiguous passages, and the overall tone and emphasis of the translation. The potential for theological bias is a significant factor when considering whether the ESV is a sound and unbiased representation of scripture.
One example of potential theological influence lies in the ESV’s rendering of passages related to gender roles and church leadership. Critics have suggested that the ESV tends to favor more traditional, complementarian interpretations of these passages, which emphasize distinct roles for men and women in both the family and the church. Such interpretations are not inherently wrong, but they reflect a specific theological viewpoint that may not be shared by all readers. Consequently, individuals holding different theological perspectives may find the ESV’s rendering of these passages to be biased or slanted. Similarly, debates have arisen regarding the ESV’s translation of verses related to divine sovereignty and human free will. Its wording in these passages may align more closely with certain Calvinistic interpretations, potentially influencing the reader’s understanding of these complex theological concepts.
Ultimately, the presence of theological perspectives within the ESV does not necessarily invalidate its value as a translation. However, it is essential for readers to be aware of these potential biases and to engage with the text critically, comparing it to other translations and consulting reputable commentaries. Recognizing the potential for theological influence allows readers to make informed judgments about the ESV’s suitability for their particular needs and to avoid uncritically accepting its interpretations as definitive. A balanced approach, acknowledging both the ESV’s strengths and its potential biases, is crucial for maximizing its value as a tool for understanding scripture. The transparency with which these issues are addressed by ESV proponents enhances its credibility.
6. Literary Style
The literary style of a Bible translation profoundly impacts its accessibility, aesthetic appeal, and perceived authority, factors that contribute significantly to evaluating whether the English Standard Version (ESV) is a good translation. Literary style encompasses the language’s overall tone, rhythm, and aesthetic qualities. It influences how the text is received and understood by its readers, directly affecting the translation’s effectiveness.
-
Formality and Tone
The ESV adopts a relatively formal and dignified tone, seeking to convey a sense of reverence and authority. This formality is achieved through careful word choices and sentence structures that often mirror the style of classical literature. While this approach may resonate with some readers, it can also create a sense of distance or perceived inaccessibility for others. The degree to which this formality enhances or detracts from the overall experience influences assessments of the translation’s quality.
-
Rhythm and Flow
The ESV strives for a consistent rhythm and flow throughout the text, aiming to create a sense of literary coherence. The translators have paid attention to the cadence of sentences and the euphony of words, seeking to produce a text that is pleasing to the ear. However, strict adherence to formal equivalence can sometimes disrupt the natural rhythm of English, resulting in awkward or stilted phrasing. The balance between accuracy and aesthetic appeal is a key consideration in evaluating the ESV’s literary style.
-
Figurative Language
The Bible is replete with figurative language, including metaphors, similes, and idioms. The ESV generally attempts to render these figures of speech accurately, while also ensuring that they are understandable to contemporary readers. However, some figures of speech are deeply embedded in their original cultural context and may not translate easily into English. The ESV’s handling of these figurative expressions can significantly impact its readability and interpretive clarity.
-
Narrative Voice
The narrative voice of a Bible translation influences its ability to engage and captivate readers. The ESV maintains a consistent narrative voice throughout the text, aiming to present the biblical stories in a clear and compelling manner. However, the formal tone and style of the ESV can sometimes detract from the immediacy and emotional impact of the narratives. The extent to which the ESV effectively conveys the narrative power of the biblical stories contributes to its overall assessment.
In conclusion, the literary style of the ESV plays a vital role in shaping its reception and influencing judgments about its quality. Its formal tone, attention to rhythm and flow, handling of figurative language, and narrative voice all contribute to the overall reading experience. Whether these stylistic choices enhance or detract from the translation’s effectiveness depends on individual preferences and the specific purposes for which the translation is used. Examining the interaction between accuracy and aesthetic appeal is critical when evaluating the ESV’s literary style and its contribution to the question of whether the ESV is a good translation.
7. Target Audience
The suitability of any Bible translation, including the English Standard Version (ESV), is fundamentally linked to its intended target audience. Assessing whether the ESV constitutes a “good translation” necessitates considering the characteristics, needs, and expectations of the readers for whom it was designed.
-
Educational Level and Familiarity with Biblical Language
The ESV’s vocabulary and sentence structure suggest a target audience possessing a moderate to high level of education and a certain familiarity with biblical concepts and terminology. While not overly technical, its language is not specifically simplified for those with limited reading skills or no prior exposure to biblical texts. Therefore, individuals with a strong educational background and some existing knowledge of the Bible are more likely to find the ESV accessible and understandable, leading them to perceive it as a “good translation” for their needs. Conversely, new readers may find its formality challenging.
-
Denominational Affiliation and Theological Perspective
The ESV has gained significant traction within conservative evangelical and reformed Protestant denominations. Its theological leanings and interpretive choices tend to align with these traditions, making it a preferred translation among individuals and congregations within these groups. However, members of other denominations or those with differing theological perspectives may find the ESV’s interpretations less appealing, potentially diminishing their perception of its overall quality. Thus, denominational affiliation plays a crucial role in shaping the perceived suitability of the ESV.
-
Purpose of Use (Study, Devotion, Public Reading)
The ESV is often favored for serious Bible study and theological reflection due to its commitment to formal equivalence and its relatively accurate rendering of the original texts. Its formality lends itself well to academic inquiry and in-depth analysis. However, its readability may be less ideal for devotional reading or public worship, where a more accessible and emotionally engaging translation might be preferred. The intended purpose of use significantly influences whether the ESV is considered a “good translation” for a particular context.
-
Cultural Context and Linguistic Preferences
The ESV utilizes contemporary English, but its style retains a certain formality that may not resonate with all cultural groups or linguistic preferences. Younger generations or individuals accustomed to more colloquial language might find the ESV’s style somewhat stilted or outdated. The translation’s cultural relevance and linguistic appeal play a crucial role in determining its overall acceptance and perceived value among different segments of the population. Modernized translations might be preferred based on the cultural context.
In conclusion, the connection between target audience and the assessment of the ESV’s quality is undeniable. The educational level, denominational affiliation, intended purpose of use, and cultural context of the reader all contribute to shaping their perception of the ESV as a “good translation.” A translation that is highly valued by one group may be less suitable or appealing to another, underscoring the importance of considering the specific needs and preferences of the target audience when evaluating the overall effectiveness of the English Standard Version.
8. Scholarly Review
Scholarly review constitutes a critical element in evaluating any Bible translation, including the English Standard Version (ESV), and therefore directly influences assessments of whether the ESV is a good translation. These reviews, conducted by biblical scholars, linguists, and theologians, offer informed analyses of the translation’s accuracy, readability, and adherence to its stated translation philosophy. The rigor and depth of scholarly critique provide a crucial counterpoint to anecdotal opinions or popular impressions, ensuring a more objective and nuanced understanding of the translation’s merits and limitations.
The impact of scholarly review on perceptions of the ESV is evident in several areas. For instance, scholars have examined the ESV’s rendering of specific passages, comparing it to the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts, and assessing the validity of the translators’ interpretive choices. These analyses often highlight both strengths and weaknesses, pointing out instances where the ESV accurately captures the nuances of the original languages, as well as cases where its formal equivalence approach results in awkward or unclear English phrasing. Moreover, scholarly reviews frequently address potential theological biases within the translation, examining whether the ESV’s renderings consistently favor particular doctrinal interpretations. These assessments contribute significantly to understanding the ESV’s place among other English Bible translations and help readers make informed decisions about its suitability for their specific needs. The practical effect is that informed consumers of biblical translations will carefully weigh the scholarship behind a translation.
In conclusion, scholarly review is an indispensable component in the process of evaluating a Bible translation’s quality. It provides a structured framework for assessing accuracy, readability, and potential biases, ultimately contributing to a more comprehensive and objective understanding of the translation’s strengths and weaknesses. While scholarly reviews do not provide a definitive or universally accepted verdict on the ESV, they offer valuable insights that inform individual judgments and contribute to ongoing discussions about the merits of different Bible translations. The critical and nuanced perspective afforded by scholarly analysis is crucial for those seeking a reliable and informed assessment of the ESV.
9. Denominational Use
The utilization of a specific Bible translation within a religious denomination frequently influences perceptions of its quality and accuracy. This application serves as a practical endorsement, shaping congregational understanding and acceptance of the text. The English Standard Version (ESV), therefore, is subjected to varied appraisals based on its adoption and reception within different denominational contexts. Denominational use becomes a practical test of whether the English Standard Version is considered a good translation.
-
Official Endorsement and Promotion
Official endorsement by a denomination often leads to widespread use of the ESV within its churches and educational institutions. This promotion can include recommending it for sermon preparation, Bible studies, and personal devotion. The imprimatur of a respected religious body lends credibility to the translation, fostering a sense of trust and reliability among its members. This official endorsement can solidify the perception that the ESV is a reliable and accurate translation.
-
Alignment with Doctrinal Distinctives
Denominations frequently select Bible translations that align with their specific doctrinal interpretations and theological emphases. The ESV’s renderings, particularly on contested theological points, may resonate more strongly with some denominations than others. This alignment contributes to the perception that the ESV is a good translation within those circles, reinforcing their established beliefs and perspectives. The compatibility between the translation and doctrinal tenets greatly influences its acceptance.
-
Influence on Congregational Understanding
Consistent use of the ESV within a denomination shapes the congregational understanding of scripture. Familiarity with its language and phrasing becomes ingrained, creating a shared interpretive framework. This shared understanding reinforces the perceived authority and accuracy of the translation, making it a standard reference point for theological discussions and practical application of biblical principles. Widespread use within a congregation can entrench its place as the standard translation.
-
Alternative Translation Use and Debate
In denominations where the ESV is not the dominant translation, debates often arise regarding its merits compared to other versions. These discussions may focus on issues of accuracy, readability, or potential theological bias. The presence of alternative translations and ongoing dialogue about their respective strengths and weaknesses can prevent the ESV from achieving universal acceptance within a particular denomination, leading to varied opinions on whether it represents a “good” translation. Ongoing translation comparison contributes to varied opinions.
The acceptance and integration of the ESV within diverse denominational contexts showcase the interplay between translation, theology, and community. Its perceived quality is thus not merely a linguistic assessment but a reflection of its resonance with specific faith traditions and their respective understandings of scripture. The varied reception underscores the complex relationship between translation choices and denominational identity, highlighting the nuanced nature of assessing a translations overall value.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions address common inquiries and concerns regarding the English Standard Version (ESV) of the Bible. These answers aim to provide clear, informative responses based on established linguistic and theological principles.
Question 1: What is the primary translation philosophy guiding the ESV?
The ESV adheres to an “essentially literal” or formal equivalence translation philosophy. This approach prioritizes mirroring the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts’ grammatical structures and word order as closely as possible within the constraints of contemporary English.
Question 2: What original texts are used as the basis for the ESV?
The ESV Old Testament primarily utilizes the Masoretic Text. The ESV New Testament is based on the critical texts established by Nestle-Aland and the United Bible Societies.
Question 3: How does the ESV address textual variants in the original manuscripts?
The ESV translators carefully consider textual variants identified in the original manuscripts. Decisions regarding which variant to include are made based on scholarly consensus and the weight of textual evidence. Footnotes are sometimes provided to indicate alternative readings.
Question 4: Is the ESV considered a particularly readable translation?
While employing contemporary English, the ESV’s commitment to formal equivalence can, at times, result in sentence structures and vocabulary that require careful attention from the reader. Its readability may be less accessible to those unfamiliar with biblical language or complex grammatical constructions.
Question 5: Has the ESV been criticized for theological bias?
Some critics have suggested that the ESV exhibits a bias toward certain theological perspectives, particularly in its rendering of passages related to gender roles and soteriology. These claims are subject to ongoing discussion and debate among scholars.
Question 6: What denominations commonly utilize the ESV?
The ESV is widely used within conservative evangelical and reformed Protestant denominations, often favored for its perceived accuracy and adherence to traditional theological interpretations.
The ESV presents a specific approach to translating scripture. Its value lies in its commitment to formal equivalence, requiring thoughtful engagement and awareness of its potential limitations.
The next section delves into a comparative analysis of the ESV against other popular English translations.
Insights on Evaluating the English Standard Version
The task of assessing a translation’s merits necessitates a comprehensive and systematic approach. Examining the English Standard Version (ESV) demands consideration of several critical factors to determine its suitability for specific purposes.
Tip 1: Understand the Translation Philosophy. The ESV emphasizes formal equivalence, aiming to mirror the original languages’ structure. Acknowledging this focus helps manage expectations regarding readability versus literal accuracy.
Tip 2: Scrutinize Key Theological Passages. Identify passages with doctrinal significance and compare the ESV’s rendering to other translations. This illuminates potential biases or interpretive choices.
Tip 3: Assess Readability Based on the Intended Audience. Evaluate whether the ESV’s vocabulary and sentence structure are appropriate for the target reader’s education level and familiarity with biblical language.
Tip 4: Consult Scholarly Reviews. Seek out reputable scholarly reviews that analyze the ESV’s accuracy, consistency, and overall quality. These provide informed perspectives and identify potential strengths and weaknesses.
Tip 5: Compare with Original Languages Where Possible. For those with knowledge of Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek, compare the ESV’s rendering to the original texts to assess its faithfulness to the source material.
Tip 6: Consider Denominational Perspective. Understand that various denominations hold different views on translation preference. Recognize how a denomination’s theological commitments may influence its endorsement or critique of the ESV.
These considerations offer a strategic framework for evaluating the English Standard Version. Recognizing both strengths and limitations empowers the discerning reader to determine its appropriateness.
Ultimately, the decision regarding the ESV’s value remains subjective. Further discussion explores comparisons between it and other popular translations to inform this decision process.
Is the English Standard Version a Good Translation? A Synthesis
The preceding exploration of the English Standard Version has illuminated its multifaceted nature. Its commitment to formal equivalence yields a translation that seeks to mirror the original texts, offering a degree of accuracy valued by many. However, this approach also presents challenges regarding readability and the potential for perceived theological biases. Scholarly reviews and denominational usage patterns further contribute to the complex assessment of its merits. Ultimately, determining whether the ESV serves as a “good translation” depends on the specific needs and priorities of the individual reader or community.
Therefore, the ongoing evaluation of biblical translations, including the ESV, remains crucial. Continued scholarly engagement, informed consideration of diverse perspectives, and a commitment to responsible interpretation are vital for ensuring that the scriptures remain accessible and relevant across generations. The reader is thus encouraged to approach the ESV, and any translation, with discernment and a dedication to understanding the rich tapestry of meaning contained within the biblical texts.
