The phenomenon whereby women experience poverty at rates disproportionately higher than men is a significant global challenge. This disparity is not merely a matter of income, but reflects a complex interplay of socioeconomic factors that systemically disadvantage women. Contributing elements include unequal access to education, healthcare, and employment opportunities, coupled with discriminatory legal and cultural norms. For instance, in many regions, women may face restricted access to land ownership, credit, and inheritance, severely limiting their economic agency and perpetuating a cycle of financial hardship. These circumstances often intensify when women are single parents or caregivers, further compounding their vulnerability.
Addressing this issue is crucial for achieving broader societal progress and sustainable development goals. Empowering women economically has cascading positive effects, benefiting families, communities, and national economies. Reduced poverty among women leads to improved health and education outcomes for their children, contributing to a more skilled and productive workforce. Furthermore, women’s increased economic participation fosters greater gender equality, strengthens social cohesion, and promotes more inclusive and equitable societies. Historically, overlooking this disparity has resulted in ineffective poverty reduction strategies and perpetuated societal inequalities.
The following sections will delve into specific aspects related to this critical global concern, exploring its multifaceted nature, examining effective intervention strategies, and analyzing the ongoing efforts to mitigate its impact on women worldwide. The discussions will encompass various dimensions, from microfinance initiatives to policy reforms aimed at promoting gender equality and economic empowerment.
1. Gender pay gap
The gender pay gap, defined as the difference between mens and womens median earnings, is a significant contributor to the disproportionate rates of poverty experienced by women globally. Its persistent presence across various industries and occupations directly exacerbates economic vulnerabilities and perpetuates financial insecurity for women and their dependents.
-
Reduced Lifetime Earnings
The cumulative impact of the gender pay gap significantly diminishes women’s lifetime earnings. Even a seemingly small difference in hourly or annual pay accumulates over years, resulting in substantially less money for retirement savings, investments, and overall financial security. This deficit directly increases the likelihood of women experiencing poverty, especially during their later years or in times of unexpected economic hardship.
-
Limited Access to Economic Resources
Lower earnings restrict women’s access to essential economic resources such as credit, housing, and education. Financial institutions are often less likely to extend loans or mortgages to women with lower incomes, hindering their ability to build assets and improve their economic standing. This limitation further marginalizes women and reinforces cycles of poverty by restricting their opportunities for upward mobility.
-
Increased Vulnerability in Single-Parent Households
The gender pay gap disproportionately affects single-parent households headed by women. With lower earnings and often the sole responsibility for childcare and household expenses, these women face heightened economic strain. The combination of reduced income and increased financial burdens places them at a significantly higher risk of poverty, impacting not only their own well-being but also the opportunities and development of their children.
-
Perpetuation of Occupational Segregation
The existence of a gender pay gap can reinforce occupational segregation, where women are concentrated in lower-paying sectors or roles. This segregation limits their career advancement opportunities and further entrenches them in positions with less earning potential. Breaking down occupational barriers and ensuring equal pay for equal work are essential steps in addressing the systemic factors that contribute to the feminisation of poverty.
The multifaceted consequences of the gender pay gap underscore its direct link to the feminisation of poverty. Addressing this disparity requires comprehensive strategies, including policies that promote equal pay, challenge occupational segregation, and provide support for women in balancing work and family responsibilities. Closing the gender pay gap is not only a matter of fairness but a crucial step towards reducing poverty and promoting gender equality.
2. Unequal access to resources
The disproportionate rates of poverty experienced by women globally are inextricably linked to unequal access to essential resources. This disparity manifests in several forms, creating systemic disadvantages that impede women’s economic empowerment and contribute directly to the feminisation of poverty. Access to land, credit, education, technology, and healthcare are fundamental building blocks for economic stability and advancement. When women are systematically denied or limited in their access to these resources, their capacity to escape poverty is severely compromised. For instance, in many developing nations, customary laws and practices often restrict women’s rights to own land, limiting their ability to generate income through agriculture or to use land as collateral for loans. This lack of ownership not only deprives them of economic opportunity but also reduces their social standing and bargaining power.
Furthermore, the financial sector often presents significant barriers for women seeking credit or investment capital. Traditional lending models frequently overlook the specific needs and circumstances of women entrepreneurs, resulting in higher interest rates, stricter collateral requirements, and limited access to financial literacy training. This financial exclusion stifles the growth of women-owned businesses and restricts their ability to participate fully in the formal economy. Examples of successful microfinance initiatives demonstrate the potential for targeted interventions to address these disparities, but these programs must be scaled up and integrated into mainstream financial systems to achieve widespread impact. The digital divide also exacerbates unequal access to resources, as women in underserved communities often lack the skills, infrastructure, and affordability necessary to participate in the digital economy. This digital exclusion limits their access to information, markets, and employment opportunities, further perpetuating their economic disadvantage.
In conclusion, unequal access to resources is a core driver of the feminisation of poverty, creating systemic barriers that hinder women’s economic advancement and perpetuate cycles of disadvantage. Addressing this issue requires comprehensive policy interventions that promote equal rights, remove discriminatory practices, and ensure women have equitable access to land, credit, education, technology, and healthcare. By dismantling these barriers and empowering women with the resources they need to thrive, societies can make significant strides towards reducing poverty, promoting gender equality, and fostering sustainable economic development.
3. Caregiving responsibilities burden
The disproportionate allocation of caregiving responsibilities to women represents a significant factor contributing to the feminisation of poverty. This burden, encompassing childcare, eldercare, and household management, often limits women’s participation in paid labor and restricts their economic advancement.
-
Reduced Labor Force Participation
Extensive caregiving duties frequently force women to reduce their working hours, take less demanding jobs, or exit the labor force altogether. This diminished participation directly translates into lower earnings, reduced opportunities for career advancement, and limited access to employer-sponsored benefits such as healthcare and retirement savings. The long-term consequences of these career interruptions can be substantial, impacting a woman’s financial security throughout her life.
-
Limited Earning Potential
When women do manage to remain in the workforce while juggling caregiving responsibilities, they may be compelled to accept lower-paying jobs that offer greater flexibility or proximity to home. This trade-off between income and caregiving exacerbates the gender pay gap and limits their earning potential. Additionally, women may face discrimination in hiring and promotion due to perceived or actual caregiving obligations, further hindering their economic prospects.
-
Increased Financial Strain on Single Mothers
The caregiving burden is particularly acute for single mothers, who often bear the sole responsibility for both earning income and providing care for their children. Without the financial or practical support of a partner, single mothers face immense challenges in balancing work and family obligations. This can lead to increased stress, decreased productivity, and a higher risk of falling into poverty.
-
Social and Economic Consequences of Informal Care
Much of the caregiving work performed by women is unpaid and informal, meaning it is not recognized or valued in traditional economic terms. This lack of recognition contributes to the undervaluation of women’s work and perpetuates the notion that caregiving is a “natural” female role rather than a valuable contribution to society. The absence of adequate social support systems for caregivers further exacerbates the burden on women, leaving them with limited resources to cope with the demands of caregiving.
The cumulative effect of these facets highlights the direct link between caregiving responsibilities and the feminisation of poverty. Addressing this issue requires a multi-pronged approach that includes policies to support affordable childcare, paid family leave, and flexible work arrangements, as well as efforts to promote a more equitable distribution of caregiving responsibilities between men and women. Recognizing the economic value of caregiving and providing adequate social support for caregivers is essential for reducing poverty and promoting gender equality.
4. Discriminatory legal frameworks
Discriminatory legal frameworks are a significant driver of the feminisation of poverty, institutionalizing unequal treatment and hindering women’s economic empowerment. These legal structures, often rooted in historical biases and cultural norms, create systemic barriers that limit women’s access to resources, opportunities, and legal recourse. The consequences of these frameworks are far-reaching, perpetuating cycles of poverty and inequality.
-
Property and Inheritance Laws
In numerous countries, property and inheritance laws discriminate against women, limiting their ability to own land, inherit assets, or control property. These restrictions deprive women of essential economic security and reduce their capacity to accumulate wealth. For instance, in some regions, widows may be disinherited, leaving them destitute and vulnerable. Without property rights, women lack collateral for loans, limiting their access to credit and hindering their ability to start or expand businesses. Such legal barriers perpetuate economic dependence and increase the risk of poverty.
-
Family and Marital Laws
Discriminatory family and marital laws can also exacerbate women’s economic vulnerability. Laws that restrict women’s rights in marriage, divorce, or child custody can leave them financially disadvantaged. For example, in some legal systems, women may have limited rights to marital property upon divorce, leaving them without adequate resources to support themselves and their children. Furthermore, laws that require women to obtain their husband’s permission to work or travel can severely restrict their economic autonomy and limit their ability to pursue income-generating opportunities.
-
Labor Laws and Employment Protections
While labor laws are intended to protect workers, discriminatory provisions or inadequate enforcement can disproportionately harm women. For example, laws that fail to address gender-based pay discrimination, sexual harassment, or maternity leave can create significant barriers to women’s economic advancement. Additionally, legal loopholes that exclude women from certain occupations or industries can limit their employment options and perpetuate gender segregation in the workforce. The absence of legal protections for domestic workers, who are predominantly women, also leaves many vulnerable to exploitation and low wages.
-
Access to Justice and Legal Recourse
Even when legal frameworks appear gender-neutral, women may face significant barriers in accessing justice and seeking legal recourse for discrimination or abuse. Factors such as lack of legal awareness, limited access to legal aid, and cultural biases within the justice system can prevent women from effectively asserting their rights. In many regions, women may face social stigma or fear of retaliation if they attempt to challenge discriminatory laws or practices. This lack of access to justice perpetuates impunity for those who violate women’s rights and undermines their ability to escape poverty.
These examples illustrate how discriminatory legal frameworks directly contribute to the feminisation of poverty by undermining women’s economic rights and opportunities. Addressing this issue requires comprehensive legal reforms to eliminate discriminatory provisions, strengthen enforcement mechanisms, and ensure women have equal access to justice and legal recourse. By dismantling these legal barriers, societies can create a more equitable environment that empowers women economically and reduces poverty.
5. Limited education opportunities
Restricted access to education for girls and women constitutes a critical factor in perpetuating the feminisation of poverty. This deprivation limits their economic prospects, diminishes their social mobility, and reinforces cycles of disadvantage across generations. The multifaceted impact of this educational deficit requires detailed examination.
-
Reduced Employability and Earning Potential
Lack of education directly translates to reduced employability and lower earning potential for women. Without the skills and qualifications demanded by the modern labor market, women are often confined to low-skilled, low-paying jobs with limited opportunities for advancement. This restricted access to stable, well-compensated employment increases their vulnerability to economic hardship and poverty.
-
Limited Access to Information and Resources
Education empowers individuals with the knowledge and critical thinking skills necessary to navigate complex social and economic systems. Without adequate education, women are often less informed about their rights, less able to access essential services, and less likely to participate in decision-making processes that affect their lives. This lack of information and agency further marginalizes them and hinders their ability to escape poverty.
-
Increased Vulnerability to Exploitation and Abuse
Limited education can increase women’s vulnerability to exploitation and abuse, including human trafficking, forced labor, and domestic violence. Without the skills and knowledge to protect themselves and their families, women may be more susceptible to manipulation and coercion, further entrenching them in cycles of poverty and dependency. Education provides women with the tools to assert their rights, challenge harmful norms, and build more secure and sustainable livelihoods.
-
Intergenerational Impact on Children’s Well-being
A mother’s education level has a profound impact on the health, education, and well-being of her children. Educated mothers are more likely to prioritize their children’s education, seek medical care, and adopt healthy behaviors, thereby improving their children’s life chances. Conversely, when women lack education, their children are more likely to experience poverty, malnutrition, and limited educational opportunities, perpetuating intergenerational cycles of disadvantage. Breaking these cycles requires investing in women’s education and empowering them to create brighter futures for their families.
These facets underscore the direct link between limited education opportunities and the perpetuation of poverty among women. Addressing this issue requires comprehensive strategies to improve access to quality education for girls and women at all levels, remove barriers to educational attainment, and ensure that education empowers women to achieve their full potential as economic actors and agents of change. Investing in women’s education is not only a matter of social justice but also a critical step towards reducing poverty and promoting sustainable development.
6. Violence against women
Violence against women (VAW) constitutes a significant, yet often overlooked, driver of the disproportionate rates of poverty experienced by women globally. This pervasive issue extends beyond physical harm, encompassing emotional, psychological, and economic abuse, all of which contribute to women’s financial instability and vulnerability.
-
Economic Abuse as a Form of Control
Economic abuse, often a component of broader patterns of VAW, involves controlling a woman’s access to financial resources, limiting her ability to work, or sabotaging her employment opportunities. Examples include preventing a woman from obtaining education or training, forcing her to quit her job, or controlling her access to bank accounts or transportation. This deliberate deprivation of economic autonomy traps women in abusive relationships and limits their ability to escape poverty independently. The long-term effects can include damaged credit, lack of job skills, and emotional trauma, further hindering their economic recovery.
-
Healthcare Costs and Lost Productivity
The physical and psychological trauma resulting from VAW often necessitates costly medical treatment and mental health services. These expenses can deplete a woman’s already limited financial resources, pushing her further into poverty. Additionally, VAW can lead to lost productivity due to absenteeism from work, reduced job performance, or the inability to maintain employment. This loss of income exacerbates financial instability and reinforces cycles of poverty.
-
Displacement and Housing Instability
Women experiencing VAW often face displacement from their homes, either voluntarily to escape abuse or involuntarily due to eviction or loss of housing. This displacement can lead to homelessness or unstable housing situations, making it difficult to maintain employment, access essential services, or provide a stable environment for children. The costs associated with finding and securing new housing can further strain limited financial resources, increasing the risk of poverty.
-
Intergenerational Impact and Social Costs
Children who witness VAW are at increased risk of experiencing emotional and behavioral problems, academic difficulties, and future involvement in violence. These long-term consequences can limit their educational and employment opportunities, perpetuating cycles of poverty across generations. Furthermore, VAW places a significant burden on social services, healthcare systems, and the criminal justice system, diverting resources from other essential programs and hindering overall economic development.
The complex interplay between violence against women and economic hardship underscores the urgent need for comprehensive strategies that address both the immediate needs of survivors and the underlying causes of violence. Interventions must include access to safe housing, financial assistance, legal aid, and counseling services, as well as efforts to challenge harmful social norms and promote gender equality. By addressing VAW as a critical driver of the feminisation of poverty, societies can create more just and equitable economic systems that empower women and ensure their financial security.
7. Lack of social protection
The absence or inadequacy of social protection mechanisms is a significant contributor to the phenomenon, whereby women experience poverty at disproportionately higher rates than men. Social protection encompasses a range of public policies and programs designed to reduce poverty and vulnerability by promoting efficient labor markets, diminishing exposure to risk, and enhancing capacity to manage economic and social risks, such as unemployment, illness, disability, and old age. When these safeguards are lacking or insufficient, women face heightened economic insecurity due to their already precarious positions within the labor market and society.
Several factors underscore this connection. Women are often concentrated in informal employment sectors, which typically lack access to social security benefits, such as pensions, unemployment insurance, and paid sick leave. Furthermore, societal norms often assign women primary responsibility for caregiving, limiting their ability to participate fully in the formal workforce and accumulate social security entitlements. The absence of affordable childcare, eldercare, and healthcare further exacerbates this vulnerability. For instance, in many developing countries, women working in agriculture or domestic service lack access to any form of social protection, leaving them highly susceptible to economic shocks and poverty during times of illness, crop failure, or economic downturn. In developed nations, part-time or contingent work, which disproportionately employs women, often comes with limited or no access to benefits like health insurance or paid time off, increasing their financial vulnerability.
Ultimately, the inadequacy of social protection systems leaves women exposed to various economic risks, reinforcing cycles of poverty and inequality. Addressing this challenge requires comprehensive policy interventions to expand social security coverage to informal workers, provide affordable care services, promote gender-responsive labor market policies, and ensure that social protection programs adequately address the specific needs and vulnerabilities of women. Strengthening social protection mechanisms is not merely a matter of social justice, but a critical step towards achieving sustainable economic development and reducing the feminisation of poverty on a global scale.
8. Exclusion from decision-making
Exclusion from decision-making processes, at both household and societal levels, directly exacerbates the feminisation of poverty. This systemic marginalisation prevents women from shaping policies and resource allocations that directly affect their economic well-being. When women’s voices are absent from discussions concerning economic development, social welfare, and legal reforms, the resulting decisions often fail to address their specific needs and vulnerabilities, perpetuating cycles of poverty. The lack of representation in political bodies, economic institutions, and community leadership roles limits women’s ability to advocate for policies that promote gender equality, such as equal pay, access to credit, and affordable childcare. This deficiency, in turn, reinforces existing power imbalances and hinders women’s economic empowerment. For instance, if local governance fails to include women, infrastructure projects might prioritize men’s needs (roads for transporting goods) over those of women (access to clean water or markets for selling produce).
The impact of this exclusion extends beyond policy formulation. When women are denied decision-making power within their own households, they may be unable to control their income, access healthcare, or make choices regarding family planning. This lack of autonomy restricts their ability to invest in their education, start businesses, or manage their finances effectively. Real-world examples abound, from regions where women are denied the right to own property or inherit land, to workplaces where they are excluded from leadership positions and strategic planning. Even in countries with progressive laws, cultural norms and traditional practices may undermine women’s ability to participate fully in decision-making, limiting their influence on economic outcomes. Organizations like UN Women and various NGOs actively work to counteract this exclusion by promoting women’s leadership and participation in decision-making at all levels.
In conclusion, the exclusion of women from decision-making is not merely a matter of social injustice but a significant economic impediment. By limiting women’s ability to shape policies, control resources, and exercise their agency, this exclusion directly contributes to the feminisation of poverty. Addressing this issue requires multifaceted efforts, including promoting women’s political participation, challenging discriminatory cultural norms, and empowering women to exercise their economic and social rights. Only through inclusive decision-making processes can societies create economic systems that benefit all members, regardless of gender, and effectively combat the feminisation of poverty.
9. Informal employment prevalence
The widespread prevalence of informal employment is a significant factor directly linked to the disproportionate incidence of poverty among women. Informal employment, characterized by a lack of legal protection, social security benefits, and decent working conditions, entraps a substantial number of women in precarious economic circumstances. The correlation arises because informal employment frequently offers lower wages compared to the formal sector, irregular or unpredictable income streams, and limited opportunities for skill development and career advancement. This lack of economic stability renders women particularly vulnerable to poverty, especially during economic downturns or personal emergencies. For example, a female street vendor in a developing nation, lacking any form of social security or health insurance, faces immediate economic hardship should she become ill or unable to work due to adverse weather conditions. The informality also precludes access to credit and other financial services, further compounding their vulnerability.
The implications extend beyond individual financial instability. High rates of female participation in informal sectors often reflect systemic barriers to formal employment, such as gender discrimination, limited access to education and training, and unequal distribution of caregiving responsibilities. In many regions, women are compelled to engage in informal work due to the absence of affordable childcare or flexible work arrangements, preventing them from pursuing formal employment opportunities that offer better pay and benefits. Moreover, informal employment frequently subjects women to exploitation, unsafe working conditions, and harassment, further undermining their economic and social well-being. For example, female domestic workers employed informally may face long hours, low wages, and a lack of legal recourse against unfair treatment or abuse. Addressing informality among women, therefore, necessitates tackling underlying gender inequalities and promoting policies that support access to education, training, and decent work opportunities.
In summary, the high prevalence of informal employment is a critical dimension of the feminisation of poverty, driving economic vulnerability, limiting opportunities for advancement, and perpetuating cycles of disadvantage. Strategies to address this issue require comprehensive approaches that combine formalization efforts, improved access to social protection, and targeted interventions to remove barriers to female participation in the formal economy. Promoting policies that ensure decent work conditions, equal pay, and access to essential services for women in both formal and informal sectors is crucial for reducing poverty and promoting gender equality.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions and answers aim to clarify common points of confusion and provide a deeper understanding of the “feminisation of poverty definition” and its related issues.
Question 1: What specifically does “feminisation of poverty definition” encompass?
The “feminisation of poverty definition” refers to the phenomenon where women experience poverty at rates disproportionately higher than men. This is not simply a matter of income disparity, but encompasses a complex interplay of social, economic, and cultural factors that systemically disadvantage women, leading to increased economic vulnerability.
Question 2: What are the primary drivers of this disproportionate poverty among women?
Several factors contribute to the feminisation of poverty. Key drivers include unequal access to education, healthcare, and employment opportunities, coupled with discriminatory legal and cultural norms. Additionally, the disproportionate burden of caregiving responsibilities, the gender pay gap, and violence against women all play significant roles.
Question 3: How does unequal access to education contribute to the feminisation of poverty?
Limited educational opportunities directly impact women’s employability and earning potential. Without adequate education, women are often confined to low-skilled, low-paying jobs with limited prospects for advancement, increasing their vulnerability to economic hardship and poverty.
Question 4: What role do discriminatory legal frameworks play in perpetuating this phenomenon?
Discriminatory legal frameworks, such as those related to property rights, inheritance, and marital laws, create systemic barriers that limit women’s access to resources, economic independence, and legal recourse, contributing to their financial insecurity and increasing the risk of poverty.
Question 5: How does violence against women relate to the feminisation of poverty?
Violence against women, including economic abuse, has significant economic consequences. Healthcare costs, lost productivity, and displacement resulting from violence can deplete women’s financial resources and limit their ability to maintain employment or build economic stability, pushing them further into poverty.
Question 6: What are some potential solutions to address the feminisation of poverty?
Addressing this issue requires a multifaceted approach, including promoting equal access to education, healthcare, and employment, reforming discriminatory laws, providing social protection mechanisms, and empowering women’s participation in decision-making processes. Challenging harmful cultural norms and addressing violence against women are also crucial steps.
The feminisation of poverty is a complex and multifaceted issue that demands a comprehensive and coordinated response from governments, organizations, and individuals. Addressing the underlying drivers of this phenomenon is essential for achieving gender equality, reducing poverty, and promoting sustainable economic development.
The next section will explore specific strategies and policies aimed at mitigating the impact of the feminisation of poverty and empowering women economically.
Addressing the Feminisation of Poverty
Effective mitigation of the disproportionate impoverishment of women requires multifaceted and strategically focused actions. The following considerations provide guidance for policymakers, organizations, and individuals seeking to address this complex issue.
Tip 1: Enforce Gender-Equal Education Policies: Guarantee access to quality education for girls and women at all levels. Implement policies that remove barriers to enrollment and retention, such as eliminating school fees, providing transportation assistance, and addressing gender-based violence in schools.
Tip 2: Reform Discriminatory Legal Frameworks: Review and amend existing laws to eliminate discriminatory provisions related to property rights, inheritance, marriage, and employment. Ensure women have equal legal standing and access to justice.
Tip 3: Promote Equal Pay and Employment Opportunities: Enforce equal pay laws and implement policies that promote gender diversity in hiring and promotion practices. Combat occupational segregation by encouraging women’s participation in traditionally male-dominated fields.
Tip 4: Strengthen Social Protection Mechanisms: Expand social security coverage to include informal sector workers, who are disproportionately women. Provide affordable childcare, eldercare, and healthcare services to reduce the burden of caregiving responsibilities on women.
Tip 5: Empower Women’s Economic Participation: Support women-owned businesses through access to credit, training, and mentorship programs. Promote financial literacy and entrepreneurship education tailored to the specific needs of women.
Tip 6: Combat Violence Against Women: Implement comprehensive strategies to prevent and address violence against women, including providing safe housing, legal assistance, and counseling services for survivors. Address the root causes of violence by challenging harmful social norms and promoting gender equality.
Tip 7: Enhance Women’s Political and Economic Representation: Implement policies that promote women’s participation in decision-making at all levels, from household and community governance to political institutions and corporate boards. Ensure women’s voices are heard and considered in policy formulation and resource allocation.
These strategic considerations represent essential steps toward dismantling the systemic barriers that contribute to the impoverishment of women. By focusing on gender-equal education, legal reform, economic empowerment, social protection, and the prevention of violence, societies can create a more equitable environment that fosters women’s economic security and reduces poverty.
The subsequent sections will provide detailed case studies and examples of successful interventions that have effectively addressed the feminisation of poverty in various contexts, offering valuable insights for future initiatives.
Conclusion
This exploration of the feminisation of poverty has illuminated the complex and interconnected factors that contribute to the disproportionate rates of poverty experienced by women globally. The analysis has underscored the significance of unequal access to resources, discriminatory legal frameworks, the burden of caregiving responsibilities, and violence against women as key drivers of this phenomenon. Furthermore, the critical roles of limited education opportunities, lack of social protection, exclusion from decision-making, and the prevalence of informal employment have been emphasized as perpetuating cycles of disadvantage.
Addressing the feminisation of poverty requires sustained and concerted efforts to dismantle systemic barriers, promote gender equality, and ensure women’s full and equal participation in economic and social life. Failure to prioritize these actions will perpetuate inequalities and undermine broader sustainable development goals. The urgency of the situation demands immediate and comprehensive action, focusing on both immediate needs and long-term solutions, to create a more just and equitable world for women and future generations.
