In Arkansas, the most severe form of criminal homicide is defined by specific circumstances surrounding the act. This legal classification involves intentional killings committed under aggravating factors enumerated by statute. An example includes the premeditated murder of a law enforcement officer acting in the line of duty, or a homicide committed during the commission of another felony, such as robbery or rape. These circumstances elevate the offense beyond simple murder and subject the accused to the possibility of the death penalty.
The significance of this definition lies in its ability to differentiate the most heinous crimes from other forms of homicide, allowing for a punishment commensurate with the severity of the offense. Its establishment reflects society’s condemnation of particularly egregious acts of violence. Historically, the criteria for this classification have evolved through legislative action and judicial interpretation, reflecting changing societal values and legal precedents regarding culpability and punishment.
Understanding the statutory elements is crucial when examining specific cases. The focus shifts to the legal criteria and the process by which guilt and sentencing are determined in such proceedings. The subsequent sections will delve into the specific factors that constitute the crime, the procedures involved in prosecuting such cases, and potential defenses that may be raised by the accused.
1. Premeditation
Premeditation is a critical element in the definition of capital murder in Arkansas. It signifies that the killing was not impulsive or accidental but rather the result of forethought and planning. The presence of premeditation transforms a homicide into a capital offense, exposing the perpetrator to the most severe penalties available under Arkansas law. This deliberate intent distinguishes capital murder from lesser charges like manslaughter or second-degree murder, where the element of premeditation is absent.
Evidence of premeditation can take various forms, including prior threats made by the accused, the procurement of a weapon specifically for the purpose of committing the crime, careful planning of the act, or actions taken after the killing to conceal evidence or avoid apprehension. For example, if an individual purchased a firearm days before using it to kill someone they had previously threatened, this series of events would strongly suggest premeditation. Proving premeditation is often a challenging task for prosecutors, as it requires demonstrating the defendant’s state of mind prior to the commission of the crime. Circumstantial evidence often plays a crucial role in establishing this element.
The requirement of premeditation in capital murder cases serves to reserve the harshest penalties for those who consciously and deliberately choose to take another person’s life. This standard reflects the legal system’s recognition that some acts are so calculated and malicious that they warrant the ultimate punishment. Understanding the nuances of premeditation is essential for legal professionals involved in these cases, as it directly impacts the determination of guilt and the severity of the sentence imposed. Its inclusion in the legal definition presents challenges in terms of evidence gathering and interpretation, yet its presence remains a cornerstone of capital murder law in Arkansas.
2. Aggravating Factors
Aggravating factors are fundamental in determining whether a homicide qualifies as capital murder in Arkansas. These specific circumstances surrounding the crime elevate the offense from other forms of murder, justifying the consideration of the death penalty or life imprisonment without parole. Their presence is not merely incidental; they are legally required to impose the harshest punishments.
-
Murder of a Law Enforcement Officer
The intentional killing of a law enforcement officer while the officer is engaged in the performance of official duties is a significant aggravating factor. This reflects the societal value placed on protecting those who uphold the law. Prosecution under this circumstance often seeks to deter violence against those who serve and protect the public. The heightened penalty underscores the gravity of interfering with law enforcement’s ability to maintain order.
-
Murder Committed During Another Felony
A homicide committed during the course of another felony, such as robbery, rape, or kidnapping, constitutes an aggravating factor. This is often referred to as felony murder. The intent to commit the underlying felony, coupled with the resulting death, transforms the crime into capital murder, even if the death was not the primary objective. The law holds the perpetrator accountable for the consequences of their actions during the commission of a dangerous felony.
-
Multiple Victims
When an individual commits multiple murders, the presence of more than one victim serves as an aggravating factor. This signifies a heightened level of violence and disregard for human life. The simultaneous taking of multiple lives is considered especially heinous and often leads to the pursuit of the death penalty. The impact on the community is magnified, justifying the enhanced punishment.
-
Murder of a Child
The murder of an individual under the age of fourteen is an aggravating factor, reflecting the vulnerability of children and society’s obligation to protect them. This factor recognizes the profound loss associated with the taking of a child’s life. Such cases often evoke strong emotional responses and are viewed as particularly reprehensible by the courts and the public.
The presence of any one or more of these aggravating factors transforms a murder into a capital offense within the Arkansas legal framework. The prosecution must prove these factors beyond a reasonable doubt to secure a conviction and potentially a death sentence. The strict legal requirements underscore the gravity of capital murder and the irreversible nature of the punishment.
3. Intentional Killing
Intentional killing is a cornerstone element within the definition of capital murder in Arkansas. It signifies that the act resulting in death was not accidental, unintentional, or negligent, but rather a deliberate choice made by the perpetrator. This crucial aspect distinguishes capital murder from lesser homicide offenses and directly impacts the severity of legal consequences.
-
Premeditation and Deliberation
Intentional killing in capital murder cases often involves premeditation and deliberation. This implies a conscious decision to take a life, formulated with some degree of planning and forethought. For example, if an individual purchases a weapon, lies in wait for the intended victim, and then carries out the act, this demonstrates a clear intent to kill. The absence of premeditation may lead to a lesser charge, even if the killing was intentional. The legal burden rests on the prosecution to demonstrate that the act was not impulsive or spontaneous, but rather the result of a calculated decision.
-
Specific Intent vs. General Intent
The legal concept of specific intent is frequently relevant. Specific intent refers to a situation where the defendant not only intended to commit the act, but also intended a specific result to occur in this case, the death of the victim. This differs from general intent, where the defendant intended to commit the act, but may not have specifically intended the resulting harm. For example, if a person fires a gun into a crowd, demonstrating a reckless disregard for human life, but not specifically intending to kill any particular individual, it may not meet the threshold of intentional killing required for capital murder. Proving specific intent often relies on circumstantial evidence and inferences drawn from the defendant’s actions and statements.
-
Transferred Intent
The doctrine of transferred intent can also apply. If a person intends to kill one individual but mistakenly kills another, the intent to kill is “transferred” to the actual victim. For example, if someone fires a gun at a person with the intent to kill, but the bullet strikes and kills a bystander, the intent to kill the original target can be transferred to the bystander, potentially satisfying the intentional killing element in a capital murder charge. This doctrine ensures that individuals are held accountable for the unintended consequences of their intentional acts of violence.
-
Voluntary Intoxication
While voluntary intoxication is generally not a defense to a criminal charge, it may be relevant in determining whether the defendant possessed the requisite intent for capital murder. If the defendant was so intoxicated that they were incapable of forming the specific intent to kill, this could mitigate the charge. However, this is a difficult argument to make, as the prosecution may argue that the defendant’s actions prior to intoxication demonstrate a pre-existing intent to commit the crime. The defendant’s level of intoxication and its impact on their mental state are crucial factors in evaluating the presence of intentional killing.
These facets highlight the intricate connection between intentional killing and the charge of capital murder in Arkansas. Proving intent is often challenging and requires a thorough examination of the circumstances surrounding the crime. The presence of intent, coupled with other aggravating factors defined by Arkansas law, is what elevates a homicide to the level of a capital offense, subjecting the accused to the potential of the death penalty.
4. Felony Murder
In Arkansas, the felony murder rule significantly broadens the scope of capital murder liability. It dictates that a death occurring during the commission of certain enumerated felonies can be prosecuted as capital murder, irrespective of whether the defendant intended to cause the death. This expansion directly impacts the application of the state’s capital murder definition, potentially subjecting individuals to the death penalty in situations where the mens rea, or mental state, would not otherwise warrant such severe punishment.
-
Enumerated Felonies
Arkansas law specifies certain felonies, such as rape, robbery, kidnapping, and arson, which, if a death results during their commission or immediate flight therefrom, trigger the felony murder rule. This list is not exhaustive but is carefully defined to include inherently dangerous felonies. For example, if an individual commits robbery, and a store clerk dies as a result of a heart attack induced by the stress of the robbery, the robber can be charged with capital murder under the felony murder doctrine in Arkansas. The key factor is the causal connection between the underlying felony and the death, regardless of whether the death was directly inflicted by the perpetrator.
-
Causation and Foreseeability
A critical aspect of felony murder is establishing causation between the felony and the death. The death must be a foreseeable consequence of the defendant’s actions during the commission of the felony. For instance, if a group conspires to commit arson, and a firefighter is killed while battling the blaze, the deaths are direct and foreseeable consequences of the actions. This establishes a basis for the prosecution to charge the arsonists with capital murder under the felony murder rule, even if they did not intend to kill anyone. Foreseeability ensures a rational link between the felony and the culpability of the perpetrator.
-
Accomplice Liability
The felony murder rule extends liability to accomplices involved in the underlying felony, even if they did not directly participate in the killing. If two individuals plan and execute a robbery, and one of them kills the victim, both can be charged with capital murder, regardless of who pulled the trigger. The rationale behind this is that all participants in the felony shared the risk of death occurring and are therefore culpable for the consequences. Accomplice liability significantly expands the pool of individuals potentially subject to capital punishment under Arkansas law.
-
Limitations and Defenses
While powerful, the felony murder rule is not without its limitations. Defenses can be raised regarding the absence of causation or the lack of participation in the underlying felony. The prosecution must demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant participated in the enumerated felony and that the death was a foreseeable consequence of that felony. The defense may argue that the death was too remote or attenuated from the felony to justify a capital murder charge. For example, if the death occurred well after the commission of the felony and was the result of intervening causes, it may weaken the case for felony murder.
The felony murder rule is a significant component of the capital murder definition in Arkansas. It reflects a legislative decision to hold individuals accountable for the foreseeable consequences of their participation in inherently dangerous felonies. The stringent application of this rule underscores the gravity with which the state treats crimes that result in the loss of life, even when the death was unintended. This expansion of liability under the capital murder definition requires careful consideration of the specific facts and circumstances of each case.
5. Victim Status
Victim status is a critical consideration within the legal framework of capital murder in Arkansas. The identity or characteristics of the victim, in specific circumstances, can elevate a homicide to a capital offense, influencing both the prosecution’s strategy and potential sentencing.
-
Law Enforcement Officers
The killing of a law enforcement officer while the officer is engaged in the performance of their official duties often constitutes an aggravating circumstance. This stems from the understanding that such an act directly undermines the rule of law and poses a threat to public safety. For instance, if an individual intentionally shoots and kills a police officer during a traffic stop, this would likely be prosecuted as capital murder in Arkansas due to the victim’s status as a law enforcement officer performing their duties. This provision serves to deter violence against those entrusted with upholding the law.
-
Children
The murder of a child, particularly one under the age of fourteen, is another victim status that often triggers capital murder charges in Arkansas. This reflects the societal imperative to protect the most vulnerable members of the community. If a person kidnaps and murders a child, this act may qualify for capital murder prosecution, in part due to the victim’s age and inherent vulnerability. The courts and the public often view such crimes as especially heinous, leading to a greater likelihood of capital charges being pursued.
-
Witnesses
If an individual is murdered to prevent them from testifying in a criminal proceeding, the victim’s status as a potential witness can be an aggravating factor. The intentional killing of a witness to obstruct justice represents a direct attack on the judicial system and can elevate the crime to capital murder. For example, if a defendant in a drug case arranges for the murder of a key witness scheduled to testify against them, this may result in a capital murder charge. Protecting the integrity of the legal process is a primary justification for considering this victim status as an aggravating factor.
-
Vulnerable Adults
While not always explicitly codified, the vulnerability of an adult victim, such as an elderly or disabled person, can be considered during sentencing. If an individual preys upon a vulnerable adult and commits murder, the victim’s inability to defend themselves may be weighed as an aggravating factor, influencing the decision to pursue capital punishment. The exploitation and killing of a defenseless individual often demonstrate a heightened level of depravity, potentially leading to capital charges. The courts acknowledge the increased vulnerability of such victims in the context of capital murder cases.
The consideration of victim status in capital murder cases reflects a legal system’s attempt to account for the unique circumstances surrounding a crime. While the intentionality and aggravating factors remain crucial, the specific identity or characteristics of the victim can significantly influence the severity of charges and potential sentencing within the Arkansas legal framework.
6. Statutory Provisions
Statutory provisions are the bedrock upon which the definition of capital murder in Arkansas rests. These laws, enacted by the state legislature, delineate the specific elements and circumstances that constitute this most serious of offenses. Without these codified regulations, the legal concept of capital murder would be devoid of clear meaning and enforceable standards.
-
Arkansas Code 5-10-101: Capital Murder Defined
This section of the Arkansas Code explicitly lays out the definition of capital murder, enumerating the specific acts and mental states required for a conviction. It establishes that a person commits capital murder if, with the premeditated and deliberate purpose of causing the death of another person, the person causes the death of any person. The statute further expands the definition to include circumstances such as the killing of a law enforcement officer in the line of duty or the commission of murder during the perpetration of another felony. This provision is the primary legal authority for prosecuting capital murder cases in Arkansas, providing the precise language that guides legal proceedings and judicial interpretations.
-
Arkansas Code 5-4-602: Authorized Sentences
This statute outlines the potential penalties for capital murder, which include death or life imprisonment without parole. It establishes the range of punishment available upon conviction and sets the stage for the sentencing phase of a capital trial. The provision also delineates the factors that the jury must consider when determining whether to impose the death penalty, such as aggravating and mitigating circumstances. This section is critical for understanding the potential consequences of a capital murder conviction and the procedures involved in determining the appropriate sentence.
-
Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure: Procedures for Capital Cases
The Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure provide the procedural framework for capital murder trials, dictating the rules of evidence, jury selection, and other aspects of the legal process. These rules ensure that capital cases are conducted fairly and in accordance with due process requirements. They address issues such as the admissibility of evidence, the presentation of expert testimony, and the rights of the defendant. Adherence to these rules is essential for upholding the integrity of the legal system and protecting the rights of the accused.
-
Judicial Interpretation and Case Law
While statutory provisions provide the foundation, judicial interpretation and case law further shape the understanding of capital murder in Arkansas. Through appellate court decisions, judges interpret the meaning and application of the statutory language, providing guidance to lower courts and attorneys. These decisions address issues such as the definition of premeditation, the scope of the felony murder rule, and the admissibility of evidence. Case law acts as a dynamic force in shaping the understanding of capital murder, adapting the legal framework to evolving circumstances and societal values.
In conclusion, the statutory provisions, as interpreted by the courts, are the essential building blocks of the capital murder definition in Arkansas. They define the elements of the offense, prescribe the potential penalties, and establish the procedures for prosecution. These legal components ensure that capital murder cases are handled with precision and fairness, safeguarding both the rights of the accused and the interests of justice.
7. Death Penalty
The death penalty in Arkansas stands as the ultimate legal consequence inextricably linked to the state’s definition of capital murder. It represents the severest punishment available, reserved for those found guilty of committing offenses that meet the stringent criteria established by law. The availability of this penalty directly shapes the legal strategies, jury deliberations, and societal perceptions surrounding capital murder cases.
-
Eligibility and Bifurcated Trials
The death penalty is not automatically imposed upon a capital murder conviction in Arkansas. A bifurcated trial system is employed, where the guilt phase is followed by a separate sentencing phase if the defendant is found guilty. During the sentencing phase, the prosecution must prove the existence of at least one statutory aggravating circumstance beyond a reasonable doubt. These circumstances, such as the murder of a law enforcement officer or the commission of murder during another felony, determine eligibility for the death penalty. For example, if a defendant is convicted of capital murder for killing a child during the commission of a kidnapping, the jury will then deliberate on whether the aggravating circumstance of the child’s age warrants the imposition of the death penalty.
-
Aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances
The sentencing phase of a capital murder trial in Arkansas requires the jury to weigh aggravating circumstances against mitigating circumstances. Aggravating circumstances are factors that support the imposition of the death penalty, while mitigating circumstances are factors that argue against it. Mitigating circumstances might include the defendant’s lack of prior criminal history, mental illness, or evidence of abuse or neglect during childhood. Juries must carefully consider all evidence presented to determine whether the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt. This balancing act is central to the determination of whether a defendant will be sentenced to death or life imprisonment without parole.
-
Appeals and Judicial Review
A sentence of death in Arkansas triggers an automatic appeal to the Arkansas Supreme Court. This appeal provides a crucial safeguard against potential errors or injustices in the trial process. The Supreme Court reviews the record for errors of law, evaluates the sufficiency of the evidence, and ensures that the sentence is not excessive or disproportionate to the crime. For instance, the appellate court might review whether the trial court properly admitted evidence or instructed the jury on the applicable law. This extensive judicial review provides an essential layer of protection for defendants facing the death penalty, helping to ensure that the sentence is imposed fairly and consistently.
-
Evolving Legal Standards and Societal Values
The application of the death penalty in Arkansas is subject to evolving legal standards and societal values. Supreme Court decisions and legislative changes can impact the types of crimes for which the death penalty can be imposed and the procedures that must be followed in capital cases. For example, the Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty cannot be imposed on individuals who are intellectually disabled or who were under the age of 18 at the time of the offense. These changes reflect a growing recognition of the need for proportionality and fairness in the application of capital punishment, as well as a heightened sensitivity to the unique circumstances of individual defendants. The ongoing evolution of these standards ensures that the death penalty remains a subject of intense legal and ethical scrutiny.
The complex interplay between the death penalty and the definition of capital murder in Arkansas highlights the profound moral, legal, and societal implications of these cases. The stringent criteria for capital murder, the careful weighing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances, the thorough appellate review, and the evolving legal standards all underscore the gravity and irreversible nature of the death penalty. Understanding these multifaceted connections is essential for navigating the intricate landscape of capital punishment in Arkansas.
8. Life Imprisonment
Life imprisonment serves as the primary alternative to the death penalty in Arkansas for individuals convicted under the state’s definition of capital murder. It represents a significant sentencing option, guaranteeing incarceration for the remainder of the offender’s natural life, thereby removing them from society and addressing concerns for public safety. Its application is contingent upon factors considered during the sentencing phase of a capital trial.
-
A Mandatory Alternative
In Arkansas, when the prosecution seeks the death penalty but the jury either does not unanimously agree on its imposition or determines that mitigating circumstances outweigh aggravating circumstances, life imprisonment without parole becomes the mandatory sentence. This ensures that those convicted under the capital murder definition face a severe and irreversible punishment, even if the death penalty is deemed inappropriate. For example, if a jury finds that the defendant’s history of severe mental illness constitutes a mitigating factor that outweighs the aggravating circumstances of the crime, life imprisonment without parole will be imposed. The availability of this alternative guarantees a significant penalty while reflecting considerations of individual culpability and circumstances.
-
Elimination of Parole
Life imprisonment as a sentence in capital murder cases in Arkansas explicitly excludes the possibility of parole. This signifies that the offender will remain incarcerated for the duration of their life, without the opportunity for early release based on good behavior or rehabilitation. The absence of parole provides certainty in the punishment and reinforces the gravity of the offense. If an individual is convicted of capital murder for the intentional killing of a law enforcement officer and sentenced to life imprisonment without parole, they will never be eligible for release, ensuring continuous confinement.
-
Appellate Review and Proportionality
While life imprisonment without parole offers a definitive punishment, sentences are subject to appellate review to ensure proportionality and fairness. The Arkansas Supreme Court reviews capital murder cases to determine whether the sentence is excessive or disproportionate to the crime. This review process considers factors such as the nature of the offense, the defendant’s background, and the presence of mitigating or aggravating circumstances. If the appellate court finds that the sentence is disproportionate, it may modify the sentence or order a new sentencing hearing. This review serves as a safeguard against potential injustices in the imposition of life imprisonment without parole.
-
Impact on Deterrence and Public Safety
Life imprisonment without parole contributes to the deterrence of violent crime and enhances public safety by permanently removing convicted capital murderers from society. The certainty of prolonged incarceration serves as a disincentive for potential offenders and provides assurance to the public that those who commit the most heinous crimes will be held accountable. The sentence ensures that communities are protected from further harm by individuals who have demonstrated a propensity for extreme violence. Life imprisonment without parole functions as a critical tool for maintaining order and protecting citizens from the threat of capital offenses.
Life imprisonment without parole serves as a pivotal sentencing alternative within the framework of Arkansas’s capital murder definition. Its mandatory application in cases where the death penalty is not imposed, coupled with the elimination of parole eligibility, provides a severe and permanent punishment for those convicted of the most egregious crimes. The availability and application of this sentence are subject to legal safeguards and considerations of proportionality, contributing to a balanced approach to justice in capital murder cases.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following addresses common inquiries concerning the legal definition and implications of capital murder within the state of Arkansas.
Question 1: What distinguishes capital murder from other forms of homicide in Arkansas?
Capital murder, under Arkansas law, requires the presence of specific aggravating factors, such as the murder of a law enforcement officer in the line of duty, or a killing committed during the perpetration of another felony. These factors elevate the crime beyond simple murder, subjecting the accused to the possibility of the death penalty or life imprisonment without parole.
Question 2: What is the role of premeditation in capital murder cases?
Premeditation is a crucial element. It indicates the killing was planned or contemplated beforehand, not a spontaneous act. The prosecution must demonstrate that the defendant had a deliberate intent to take a life, differentiating capital murder from lesser charges.
Question 3: Does the felony murder rule apply in Arkansas capital murder cases?
Yes, the felony murder rule stipulates that if a death occurs during the commission of certain enumerated felonies (such as rape, robbery, or kidnapping), it can be prosecuted as capital murder, even if the death was unintentional. This significantly broadens the scope of liability.
Question 4: What are the potential penalties for a capital murder conviction in Arkansas?
The authorized sentences for capital murder in Arkansas are death or life imprisonment without parole. The imposition of the death penalty requires a separate sentencing phase where the jury considers both aggravating and mitigating circumstances.
Question 5: Are there any defenses available to a charge of capital murder?
Potential defenses include challenging the element of premeditation, arguing the absence of aggravating factors, disputing the causal link in felony murder cases, or presenting evidence of insanity or diminished capacity. The viability of these defenses depends on the specific facts and circumstances of the case.
Question 6: What happens if the jury cannot agree on the death penalty?
If the jury is unable to reach a unanimous decision on the imposition of the death penalty, the defendant will be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. This serves as the mandatory alternative punishment in such scenarios.
These FAQs provide a concise overview of key aspects related to the legal definition of capital murder in Arkansas.
The subsequent sections will examine notable cases of legal precedents that shape the understanding of this critical issue.
Navigating the Nuances
This section offers crucial insights for legal professionals and researchers examining Arkansas capital murder cases, focusing on key elements of the legal definition.
Tip 1: Master Statutory Language: A thorough understanding of Arkansas Code 5-10-101 (Capital Murder Defined) and related statutes is paramount. The exact wording dictates which elements must be proven to secure a conviction.
Tip 2: Scrutinize Premeditation Evidence: Premeditation separates capital murder from lesser homicide charges. Meticulously analyze all evidence to determine if the killing was planned or impulsive. Consider factors like prior threats, weapon procurement, and planning.
Tip 3: Verify Aggravating Factors: The presence of a statutory aggravating factor is essential for a capital murder conviction. Verify that the alleged aggravating factor fits the precise legal definition and can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Tip 4: Examine Felony Murder Causation: In felony murder cases, a direct causal link between the underlying felony and the death must be established. Analyze whether the death was a foreseeable consequence of the felony, avoiding attenuated connections.
Tip 5: Assess Accomplice Liability Carefully: When multiple individuals are involved, determine the degree of each participant’s involvement and intent. Accomplice liability requires establishing that each individual shared the criminal purpose and foreseeable consequences.
Tip 6: Address Victim Status Implication: Consider how the victim’s status (e.g., law enforcement officer, child) influences the case. Understand the specific legal protections afforded to certain victim categories and how they may impact jury perceptions.
Tip 7: Navigate Mental Health Defenses: Carefully assess any claims of insanity or diminished capacity. Review relevant medical records and expert testimony to determine if the defendant’s mental state negates the required intent for capital murder.
By meticulously addressing these factors, legal professionals can navigate the complexities of Arkansas capital murder cases more effectively.
The subsequent section offers resources for continued learning on this critical subject.
capital murders definition arkansas
This exploration has meticulously dissected the core components of capital murders definition arkansas, encompassing premeditation, aggravating factors, intentionality, the felony murder rule, victim status, statutory provisions, the potential for a death sentence, and the alternative of life imprisonment. The analysis has underscored the gravity and complexity inherent in these cases within the Arkansas legal system.
A thorough understanding of these intricate elements is paramount for legal professionals, policymakers, and the public alike. The application of capital punishment demands careful consideration, adherence to due process, and a commitment to justice. Continued scrutiny of legal standards and evolving societal values is essential to ensure fair and equitable application of this most severe of penalties within the framework of capital murders definition arkansas.
